arned Patanjali that it would be fined Rs 1 crore if a false claim is made that its products can “cure” certain diseases. Despite the apex court’s rap, Patanjali published misleading ads in two broadly circulated regional newspapers on December 4 last year.
The DMR (OA) 1954 prohibits the advertisement of certain drugs to treat certain diseases and disorders. It states that “no person shall take any part in the publication of any advertisement referring to any drug in terms which suggest or are calculated to lead to the use of that drug for the diagnosis, cure, mitigation, treatment or prevention of any diseases, disorder or condition.”
Follow The New Indian Express channel on WhatsApp
Download the TNIE app to stay with u
— Read on www.newindianexpress.com/amp/story/nation/2024/Apr/01/no-action-on-patanjali-by-uttarakhand-govt-in-2-years-over-misleading-ads










