Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of 99 cases of 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a descriptive study

Nanshan Chen*, Min Zhou*, Xuan Dong*, Jieming Qu*, Fengyun Gong, Yang Han, Yang Qiu, Jingli Wang, Ying Liu, Yuan Wei, Jia’an Xia, Ting Yu, Xinxin Zhang, Li Zhang

Background In December, 2019, a pneumonia associated with the 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) emerged in Wuhan, China. We aimed to further clarify the epidemiological and clinical characteristics of 2019-nCoV pneumonia.

Methods In this retrospective, single-centre study, we included all con rmed cases of 2019-nCoV in Wuhan Jinyintan Hospital from Jan 1 to Jan 20, 2020. Cases were con rmed by real-time RT-PCR and were analysed for epidemiological, demographic, clinical, and radiological features and laboratory data. Outcomes were followed up until Jan 25, 2020.

Findings Of the 99 patients with 2019-nCoV pneumonia, 49 (49%) had a history of exposure to the Huanan seafood market. The average age of the patients was 55·5 years (SD 13·1), including 67 men and 32 women. 2019-nCoV was detected in all patients by real-time RT-PCR. 50 (51%) patients had chronic diseases. Patients had clinical manifestations of fever (82 [83%] patients), cough (81 [82%] patients), shortness of breath (31 [31%] patients), muscle ache (11 [11%] patients), confusion (nine [9%] patients), headache (eight [8%] patients), sore throat ( ve [5%] patients), rhinorrhoea (four [4%] patients), chest pain (two [2%] patients), diarrhoea (two [2%] patients), and nausea and vomiting (one [1%] patient). According to imaging examination, 74 (75%) patients showed bilateral pneumonia, 14 (14%) patients showed multiple mottling and ground-glass opacity, and one (1%) patient had pneumothorax. 17 (17%) patients developed acute respiratory distress syndrome and, among them, 11 (11%) patients worsened in a short period of time and died of multiple organ failure.

Interpretation The 2019-nCoV infection was of clustering onset, is more likely to a ect older males with comorbidities, and can result in severe and even fatal respiratory diseases such as acute respiratory distress syndrome. In general, characteristics of patients who died were in line with the MuLBSTA score, an early warning model for predicting mortality in viral pneumonia. Further investigation is needed to explore the applicability of the MuLBSTA score in predicting the risk of mortality in 2019-nCoV infection.

Published Online January 29, 2020 https://doi.org/10.1016/ S0140-6736(20)30211-7

*Contributed equally.

Tuberculosis and Respiratory Department (Prof N Chen MD, X Dong PhD, Y Wei MD, J Xia MD, T Yu MD, Prof L Zhang MD), Infection Disease Department (F Gong MD, J Wang MD), Science and Education Department (Y Han PhD), and The Office of Drug Clinical Trial Institution (Y Liu MD), Wuhan Jinyintan Hospital, Wuhan, China; Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Ruijin Hospital
(Prof M Zhou MD, Prof J Qu MD), Institute of Respiratory Diseases (Prof M Zhou,
Prof J Qu), Research Laboratory of Clinical Virology, Ruijin Hospital and Ruijin Hospital North (Prof X Zhang MD), and Clinical Research Center, Ruijin Hospital North (Prof X Zhang), Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China; State Key Laboratory of Virology, Wuhan Institute of Virology, Center for Biosafety Mega-Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, China (Prof Y Qiu PhD, Y Han)

Correspondence to:
Prof Li Zhang, Tuberculosis and Respiratory Department, Wuhan Jinyintan Hospital, Dongxihu District, Wuhan 430023, China zhangli080806@163.com


Prof Xinxin Zhang, Research Laboratory of Clinical Virology, Ruijin Hospital and Ruijin Hospital North, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China zhangx@shsmu.edu.cn



Funding National Key R&D Program of China. Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.


Since Dec 8, 2019, several cases of pneumonia of unknown aetiology have been reported in Wuhan, Hubei province, China.1–3 Most patients worked at or lived around the local Huanan seafood wholesale market, where live animals were also on sale. In the early stages of this pneumonia, severe acute respiratory infection symptoms occurred, with some patients rapidly dev­ eloping acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), acute respiratory failure, and other serious complications. On Jan 7, a novel coronavirus was identi ed by the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) from the throat swab sample of a patient, and was subsequently named 2019­nCoV by WHO.4

Coronaviruses can cause multiple system infections in various animals and mainly respiratory tract infections in humans, such as severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS).5–7 Most patients have mild symptoms and good prognosis.

So far, a few patients with 2019­nCoV have developed severe pneumonia, pulmonary oedema, ARDS, or mul­ tiple organ failure and have died. All costs of 2019­nCoV treatment are covered by medical insurance in China.

At present, information regarding the epidemiology and clinical features of pneumonia caused by 2019­nCoV is scarce.1–3 In this study, we did a comprehensive exploration of the epidemiology and clinical features of 99 patients with con rmed 2019­nCoV pneumonia admitted to Jinyintan Hospital, Wuhan, which admitted the rst patients with 2019­nCoV to be reported on.


Study design and participants

For this retrospective, single­centre study, we recruited patients from Jan 1 to Jan 20, 2020, at Jinyintan Hospital in Wuhan, China. Jinyintan Hospital is a hospital for adults (ie, aged ≥14 years) specialising in infectious diseases. According to the arrangements put in place by

http://www.thelancet.com Published online January 29, 2020 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30211-7



Research in context

Evidence before this study

We searched PubMed on Jan 25, 2020, for articles that describe the epidemiological and clinical characteristics of the 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) in Wuhan, China, using the search terms “novel coronavirus” and “pneumonia” with no language or time restrictions. Previously published research discussed the epidemiological and clinical characteristics of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus or Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus, and primary study for the evolution of the novel coronavirus from Wuhan. The only report of clinical features of patients infected with 2019-nCoV was published on Jan 24, 2020, with 41 cases included.

Added value of this study

We have obtained data on 99 patients in Wuhan, China, to further explore the epidemiology and clinical features of 2019-nCoV. This study is, to our knowledge, the largest case series to date of 2019-nCoV infections, with 99 patients who were transferred to Jinyintan Hospital from other hospitals all

over Wuhan, and provides further information on the demographic, clinical, epidemiological, and laboratory features of patients. It presents the latest status of 2019-nCoV infection in China and is an extended investigation of the previous report, with 58 extra cases and more details on combined bacterial and fungal infections. In all patients admitted with medical comorbidities of 2019-nCoV, a wide range of clinical manifestations can be seen and are associated with substantial outcomes.

Implications of all the available evidence

The 2019-nCoV infection was of clustering onset, is more likely to a ect older men with comorbidities, and could result in severe and even fatal respiratory diseases such as acute respiratory distress syndrome. Early identi cation and timely treatment of critical cases of 2019-nCoV are important. E ective life support and active treatment of complications should be provided to e ectively reduce the severity of patients’ conditions and prevent the spread of this new coronavirus in China and worldwide.


http://www.thelancet.com Published online January 29, 2020 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30211-7

the Chinese Government, adult patients were admitted centrally to the hospital from the whole of Wuhan without selectivity. All patients at Jinyintan Hospital who were diagnosed as having 2019­nCoV pneumonia according to WHO interim guidance were enrolled in this study.4 All the data of included cases have been shared with WHO. The study was approved by Jinyintan Hospital Ethics Committee and written informed consent was obtained from patients involved before enrolment when data were collected retrospectively.


We obtained epidemiological, demographic, clinical, laboratory, management, and outcome data from patients’ medical records. Clinical outcomes were followed up to Jan 25, 2020. If data were missing from the records or clari cation was needed, we obtained data by direct communication with attending doctors and other health­ care providers. All data were checked by two physicians (XD and YQ).

Laboratory con rmation of 2019­nCoV was done in four di erent institutions: the Chinese CDC, the Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Academy of Military Medical Sciences, and Wuhan Institute of Virology, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Throat­swab specimens from the upper respiratory tract that were obtained from all patients at admission were maintained in viral­transport medium. 2019­nCoV was con rmed by real­time RT­PCR using the same protocol described previously.3 RT­PCR detection reagents were provided by the four institutions. Other respiratory viruses including in uenza A virus (H1N1, H3N2, H7N9), in uenza B virus, respiratory syncytial virus, parain uenza virus, adenovirus, SARS coronavirus (SARS­CoV), and MERS

coronavirus (MERS­CoV) were also examined with real­ time RT­PCR

Sputum or endotracheal aspirates were obtained at admission for identi cation of possible causative bacteria or fungi. Additionally, all patients were given chest x­rays or chest CT.


We describe epidemiological data (ie, short­term [occasional visits] and long­term [worked at or lived near] exposure to Huanan seafood market); demographics; signs and symptoms on admission; comorbidity; labora­ tory results; co­infection with other respiratory pathogens; chest radiography and CT ndings; treatment received for 2019­nCoV; and clinical outcomes.

Statistical analysis

We present continuous measurements as mean (SD) if they are normally distributed or median (IQR) if they are not, and categorical variables as count (%). For laboratory results, we also assessed whether the measurements were outside the normal range. We used SPSS (version 26.0) for all analyses.

Role of the funding source

The funder of the study had no role in study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, or writing of the report. The corresponding authors had full access to all the data in the study and had nal responsibility for the decision to submit for publication.


99 patients with 2019­nCoV were included in this study, two of whom were husband and wife. In total, 49 (49%)


patients were clustered and had a history of exposure to the Huanan seafood market. Among them, there were 47 patients with long­term exposure history, most of whom were salesmen or market managers, and two patients with short­term exposure history, who were shoppers. None of the patients were medical sta . Most patients were men, with a mean age of 55·5 years (SD 13·1; table 1). 50 (51%) patients had chronic diseases, including cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases, endocrine system disease, digestive system disease, respiratory system disease, malignant tumour, and nervous system disease (table 1).

On admission, most patients had fever or cough and a third of patients had shortness of breath (table 2). Other symptoms included muscle ache, headache,

confusion, chest pain, and diarrhoea (table 2). Many patients presented with organ function damage, including 17 (17%) with ARDS, eight (8%) with acute respiratory injury, three (3%) with acute renal injury, four (4%) with septic shock, and one (1%) with venti­ lator­associatedpneumonia(table2).

On admission, leucocytes were below the normal range in nine (9%) patients and above the normal range in 24 (24%) patients (table 3). 38 (38%) patients had neutrophils above the normal range. Lymphocytes and haemoglobin were below the normal range in many

Patients (n=99)

Signs and symptoms at admission


82 (83%)


81 (82%)

Shortness of breath

31 (31%)

Muscle ache

11 (11%)


9 (9%)


8 (8%)

Sore throat

5 (5%)


4 (4%)

Chest pain

2 (2%)


2 (2%)

Nausea and vomiting

1 (1%)

More than one sign or symptom

89 (90%)

Fever, cough, and shortness of breath

15 (15%)

Comorbid conditions

Chest x-ray and CT ndings



33 (33%)


17 (17%)

Acute renal injury

3 (3%)

Acute respiratory injury

8 (8%)

Septic shock

4 (4%)

Ventilator-associated pneumonia

1 (1%)

Unilateral pneumonia

25 (25%)

Bilateral pneumonia

74 (75%)

Multiple mottling and ground-glass opacity

14 (14%)

Oxygen therapy

75 (76%)

Mechanical ventilation

Non-invasive (ie, face mask)

13 (13%)


4 (4%)


9 (9%)


3 (3%)

Antibiotic treatment

70 (71%)

Antifungal treatment

15 (15%)

Antiviral treatment

75 (76%)


19 (19%)

Intravenous immunoglobulin therapy

27 (27%)

2019-nCoV=2019 novel coronavirus. ARDS=acute respiratory distress syndrome. ECMO=extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. CRRT=continuous renal replacement therapy.

Table 2: Clinical characteristics and treatment of patients with 2019-nCoV pneumonia

Age, years Mean (SD) Range ≤39 40–49 50–59 60–69 ≥70

Occupation Agricultural worker Self-employed Employee

Chronic medical illness
Cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases Digestive system disease
Endocrine system disease†
Malignant tumour
Nervous system disease
Respiratory system disease

Clinical outcome Remained in hospital Discharged

Patients (n=99)

55·5 (13·1) 21–82
10 (10%) 22 (22%) 30 (30%) 22 (22%) 15 (15%)

2 (2%) 63 (64%) 15 (15%) 19 (19%)

50 (51%) 40 (40%) 11 (11%) 13 (13%) 1 (1%)

1 (1%) 1 (1%)

57 (58%) 31 (31%) 11 (11%)



32 (32%)


67 (68%)

Exposure to Huanan seafood market*

49 (49%)

Long-term exposure history

47 (47%)

Short-term exposure history

2 (2%)

Admission to intensive care unit

23 (23%)

Data are n (%) unless speci ed otherwise. 2019-nCoV=2019 novel coronavirus. *Long-term exposure is having worked at or lived in or around Huanan seafood market, whereas short-term exposure is having been to Huanan seafood market occasionally. †12 were diabetic.

Table 1: Demographics, baseline characteristics, and clinical outcomes of 99 patients admitted to Wuhan Jinyintan Hospital (Jan 1–20, 2020) with 2019-nCoV pneumonia

http://www.thelancet.com Published online January 29, 2020 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30211-7



Patients (n=99)

Blood routine

Leucocytes (× 109 per L; normal range 3·5–9·5)

7·5 (3·6)


24 (24%)


9 (9%)

Neutrophils (× 109 per L; normal range 1·8–6·3)

5·0 (3·3–8·1)


38 (38%)

Lymphocytes (× 109 per L; normal range 1·1–3·2)

0·9 (0·5)


35 (35%)

Platelets (× 109 per L; normal range 125·0–350·0)

213·5 (79·1)


4 (4%)


12 (12%)

Haemoglobin (g/L; normal range 130·0–175·0)

129·8 (14·8)


50 (51%)

Coagulation function

Blood biochemistry

Activated partial thromboplastin time (s; normal range 21·0–37·0)

27·3 (10·2)


6 (6%)


16 (16%)

Prothrombin time (s; normal range 10·5–13·5)

11·3 (1·9)


5 (5%)


30 (30%)

D-dimer (μg/L; normal range 0·0–1·5)

0·9 (0·5–2·8)


36 (36%)

Albumin (g/L; normal range 40·0–55·0)

31·6 (4·0)


97 (98%)

Alanine aminotransferase (U/L; normal range 9·0–50·0)

39·0 (22·0–53·0)


28 (28%)

Aspartate aminotransferase (U/L; normal range 15·0–40·0)

34·0 (26·0–48·0)


35 (35%)

Total bilirubin (μmol/L; normal range 0·0–21·0)

15·1 (7·3)


18 (18%)

Blood urea nitrogen (mmol/L; normal range 3·6–9·5)

5·9 (2·6)


6 (6%)


17 (17%)

Serum creatinine (μmol/L; normal range 57·0–111·0)

75·6 (25·0)


3 (3%)


21 (21%)

Creatine kinase (U/L; normal range 50·0–310·0)

85·0 (51·0–184·0)


13 (13%)


23 (23%)

Lactate dehydrogenase (U/L; normal range 120·0–250·0)

336·0 (260·0–447·0)


75 (76%)

Myoglobin (ng/mL; normal range 0·0–146·9)

49·5 (32·2–99·8)


15 (15%)

Glucose (mmol/L; normal range 3·9–6·1)

7·4 (3·4)


51 (52%)


1 (1%)

(Table 3 continues in next column)

Patients (n=99)

(Continued from previous column)

Infection-related biomarkers

Procalcitonin (ng/mL; normal range 0·0–5·0)

0·5 (1·1)


6 (6%)

Interleukin-6 (pg/mL; normal range 0·0–7·0)

7·9 (6·1–10·6)


51 (52%)

Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (mm/h; normal range 0·0–15·0)

49·9 (23·4)


84 (85%)

Serum ferritin (ng/mL; normal range 21·0–274·7)

808·7 (490·7)


62 (63%)

C-reactive protein (mg/L; normal range 0·0–5·0)*

51·4 (41·8)


63/73 (86%)


Other viruses



1 (1%)


4 (4%)

Data are n (%), n/N (%), mean (SD), and median (IQR). Increased means over the upper limit of the normal range and decreased means below the lower limit of the normal range. 2019-nCoV=2019 novel coronavirus. *Data available for
73 patients.

Table 3: Laboratory results of patients with 2019-nCoV pneumonia


http://www.thelancet.com Published online January 29, 2020 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30211-7

patients (table 3). Platelets were below the normal range in 12 (12%) patients and above the normal range in four (4%). 43 patients had di ering degrees of liver function abnormality, with alanine aminotransferase (ALT) or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) above the normal range (table 3); one patient had severe liver function damage (ALT 7590 U/L, AST 1445 U/L). Most patients had abnormal myocardial zymogram, which showed the elevation of creatine kinase in 13 (13%) patients and the elevation of lactate dehy­ drogenase in 75 (76%) patients, one of whom also showed abnormal creatine kinase (6280 U/L) and lactate dehydrogenase (20740 U/L). Seven (7%) patients had di erent degrees of renal function damage, with elevated blood urea nitrogen or serum creatinine. Regarding the infection index, procalcitonin was above the normal range in six (6%) patients. Most patients had serum ferritin above the normal range (table 3). 73 patients were tested for C­reactive protein, most of whom had levels above the normal range (table 3).

All patients were tested for nine respiratory pathogens and the nucleic acid of in uenza viruses A and B. Bacteria and fungi culture were done at the same time. We did not nd other respiratory viruses in any of the patients. Acinetobacter baumannii, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Aspergillus avus were all cultured in one patient. A baumannii turned out to be highly resistant to antibiotics. One case of fungal infection was diagnosed as Candida glabrata and three cases of fungal infection were diagnosed as Candida albicans.

According to chest x­ray and CT, 74 (75%) patients showed bilateral pneumonia (75%) with just 25 (25%)

patients showing unilateral pneumonia (table 2). 14 (14%) patients showed multiple mottling and ground­ glass opacity (table 2; gure). Additionally, pneumothorax occurred in one (1%) patient.

All patients were treated in isolation. 75 (76%) patients received antiviral treatment, including oseltamivir (75 mg every 12 h, orally), ganciclovir (0·25 g every 12 h, intravenously), and lopinavir and ritonavir tablets (500 mg twice daily, orally). The duration of antiviral treatment was 3–14 days (median 3 days [IQR 3–6]).

Most patients were given antibiotic treatment (table 2); 25 (25%) patients were treated with a single antibiotic and 45 (45%) patients were given combination therapy. The antibiotics used generally covered common patho­ gens and some atypical pathogens; when secondary bacterial infection occurred, medication was admin­ istered according to the results of bacterial culture and drug sensitivity. The antibiotics used were cephalo­ sporins, quinolones, carbapenems, tigecycline against methicillin­resistant Staphylococcus aureus, linezolid, and antifungal drugs. The duration of antibiotic treatment was 3–17 days (median 5 days [IQR 3–7]). 19 (19%) patients were also treated with methylprednisolone sodium succinate, methylprednisolone, and dexametha­ sone for 3–15 days (median 5 [3–7]).

13 patients used non­invasive ventilator mechanical ventilation for 4–22 days (median 9 days [IQR 7–19]). Four patients used an invasive ventilator to assist ventilation for 3–20 days (median 17 [12–19]). The ventilator adopted P­SIMV mode, the inhaled oxygen concentration was 35–100%, and the positive end­ expiratory pressure was 6–12 cm H2O. All four patients were still using ventilators at data cuto . Moreover, nine (9%) patients received continuous blood puri ­ cation due to renal failure and three (3%) patients were treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO; table 2).

By the end of Jan 25, 31 (31%) patients had been discharged and 11 (11%) patients had died; all other patients were still in hospital (table 1). The rst two deaths were a 61­year­old man (patient 1) and a 69­year­old man (patient 2). They had no previous chronic underlying disease but had a long history of smoking. Patient 1 was transferred to Jinyintan Hospital and diagnosed with severe pneumonia and ARDS. He was immediately admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) and given an intubated ventilator­assisted breathing therapy. Later, the patient, having developed severe respiratory failure, heart failure, and sepsis, experienced a sudden cardiac arrest on the 11th day of admission and was declared dead. Patient 2 had severe pneumonia and ARDS after admission. The patient was transferred to the ICU and given ventilator­assisted breathing, and received anti­ infection and ECMO treatment after admission. The patient’s hypoxaemia remained unresolved. On the ninth day of admission, the patient died of severe pneumonia, septic shock, and respiratory failure. The intervals

Figure: Chest x-rays and chest CTs of three patients
Case 1: chest x-ray was obtained on Jan 1 (1A). The brightness of both lungs was di usely decreased, showing
a large area of patchy shadow with uneven density. Tracheal intubation was seen in the trachea and the heart shadow outline was not clear. The catheter shadow was seen from the right axilla to the mediastinum. Bilateral diaphragmatic surface and costal diaphragmatic angle were not clear, and chest x-ray on Jan 2 showed worse status (1B). Case 2: chest x-ray obtained on Jan 6 (2A). The brightness of both lungs was decreased and multiple patchy shadows were observed; edges were blurred, and large ground-glass opacity and condensation shadows were mainly on the lower right lobe. Tracheal intubation could be seen in the trachea. Heart shadow roughly presents in the normal range. On the left side, the diaphragmatic surface is not clearly displayed. The right side of the diaphragmatic surface was light and smooth and rib phrenic angle was less sharp. Chest x-ray on Jan 10 showed worse status (2B). Case 3: chest CT obtained on Jan 1 (3A) showed mass shadows of high density in both lungs. Bright bronchogram is seen in the lung tissue area of the lesion, which is also called bronchoin ation sign. Chest CT on Jan 15 showed improved status (3B).


Case 1

1A First chest x-ray

1B Second chest x-ray


Case 2

2A First chest x-ray

2B Second chest x-ray


Case 3

3A First chest CT

3B Second chest CT


http://www.thelancet.com Published online January 29, 2020 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30211-7 5


http://www.thelancet.com Published online January 29, 2020 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30211-7


between the onset of symptoms and the use of ventilator­ assisted breathing in the two patients were 3 days and 10 days, respectively. The course of the disease and lung lesions progressed rapidly in both patients, with both developing multiple organ failure in a short time. The deaths of these two patients were consistent with the MuLBSTA score, an early warning model for predicting mortality in viral pneumonia.8

Of the remaining nine patients who died, eight patients had lymphopenia, seven had bilateral pneumonia, ve were older than 60 years, three had hypertension, and one was a heavy smoker.


This is an extended descriptive study on the epidemiology and clinical characteristics of the 2019­nCoV, including data on 99 patients who were transferred to Jinyintan Hospital from other hospitals across Wuhan. It presents the latest status of the 2019­nCoV infection in China and adds details on combined bacterial and fungal infections.

Human coronavirus is one of the main pathogens of respiratory infection. The two highly pathogenic viruses, SARS­CoV and MERS­CoV, cause severe res­ piratory syndrome in humans and four other human coronaviruses (HCoV­OC43, HCoV­229E, HCoV­NL63, HCoV­HKU1) induce mild upper respiratory disease. The major SARS­CoV outbreak involving 8422 patients occurred during 2002–03 and spread to 29 countries globally.9,10 MERS­CoV emerged in Middle Eastern countries in 2012 but was imported into China.11,12 The sequence of 2019­nCoV is relatively di erent from the six other coronavirus subtypes but can be classi ed as betacoronavirus. SARS­CoV and MERS­CoV can be transmitted directly to humans from civets and dromedary camels, respectively, and both viruses origi­ nate in bats, but the origin of 2019­nCoV needs further investigation.13–15 2019­nCoV also has enveloped virions that measure approximately 50–200 nm in diameter with a single positive­sense RNA genome.16 Club­shaped glycoprotein spikes in the envelope give the virus a crown­like or coronal appearance. Transmission rates are unknown for 2019­nCoV; however, there is evidence of human­to­human transmission. None of the 99 patients we examined were medical sta , but 15 medical workers have been reported with 2019­nCoV infection, 14 of whom are assumed to have been infected by the same patient.17 The mortality of SARS­CoV has been reported as more than 10% and MERS­CoV at more than 35%.5,18 At data cuto for this study, mortality of the 99 included patients infected by 2019­nCoV was 11%, resembling that in a previous study.3 However, additional deaths might occur in those still hospitalised.

We observed a greater number of men than women in the 99 cases of 2019­nCoV infection. MERS­CoV and SARS­CoV have also been found to infect more males than females.19,20 The reduced susceptibility of females to viral infections could be attributed to the protection

from X chromosome and sex hormones, which play an important role in innate and adaptive immunity.21 Additionally, about half of patients infected by 2019­nCoV had chronic underlying diseases, mainly cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases and diabetes; this is similar to MERS­CoV.19 Our results suggest that 2019­nCoV is more likely to infect older adult males with chronic comorbidities as a result of the weaker immune func­ tions of these patients.19–22

Some patients, especially severely ill ones, had co­ infections of bacteria and fungi. Common bacterial cultures of patients with secondary infections included A baumannii, K pneumoniae, A avus, C glabrata, and C albicans.8 The high drug resistance rate of A baumannii can cause di culties with anti­infective treatment, leading to higher possibility of developing septic shock.23 For severe mixed infections, in addition to the virulence factors of pathogens, the host’s immune status is also one of the important factors. Old age, obesity, and presence of comorbidity might be associated with increased mor­ tality.24 When populations with low immune function, such as older people, diabetics, people with HIV infection, people with long­term use of immunosuppressive agents, and pregnant women, are infected with 2019­nCoV, prompt administration of antibiotics to prevent infection and strengthening of immune support treatment might reduce complications and mortality.

In terms of laboratory tests, the absolute value of lymphocytes in most patients was reduced. This result suggests that 2019­nCoV might mainly act on lympho­ cytes, especially T lymphocytes, as does SARS­CoV. Virus particles spread through the respiratory mucosa and infect other cells, induce a cytokine storm in the body, generate a series of immune responses, and cause changes in peripheral white blood cells and immune cells such as lymphocytes. Some patients progressed rapidly with ARDS and septic shock, which was eventually followed by multiple organ failure. Therefore, early identi cation and timely treatment of critical cases is of crucial importance. Use of intravenous immunoglobulin is recommended to enhance the ability of anti­infection for severely ill patients and steroids (methylprednisolone 1–2 mg/kg per day) are recommended for patients with ARDS, for as short a duration of treatment as possible. Some studies suggest that a substantial decrease in the total number of lymphocytes indicates that coronavirus consumes many immune cells and inhibits the body’s cellular immune function. Damage to T lymphocytes might be an important factor leading to exacerbations of patients.25 The low absolute value of lymphocytes could be used as a reference index in the diagnosis of new coronavirus infections in the clinic.

In general, the characteristics of patients who died were in line with the early warning model for predicting mortality in viral pneumonia in our previous study: the MuLBSTA score.8 The MuLBSTA score system contains six indexes, which are multilobular in ltration, lymphopenia, bacterial

co­infection, smoking history, hypertension, and age. Further investigation is needed to explore the applicability of the MuLBSTA score in predicting the risk of mortality in 2019­nCoV infection.

This study has several limitations. First, only 99 patients with con rmed 2019­nCoV were included; suspected but undiagnosed cases were ruled out in the analyses. It would be better to include as many patients as possible in Wuhan, in other cities in China, and even in other countries to get a more comprehensive understanding of 2019­nCoV. Second, more detailed patient information, particularly regarding clinical outcomes, was unavailable at the time of analysis; however, the data in this study permit an early assess­ ment of the epidemiological and clinical characteristics of 2019­nCoV pneumonia in Wuhan, China.

In conclusion, the infection of 2019­nCoV was of clustering onset, is more likely to infect older men with comorbidities, and can result in severe and even fatal respiratory diseases such as ARDS.


NC, XD, FG, YH, YQ, JW, YL, YW, JX, TY, and LZ collected the epidemiological and clinical data and processed statistical data. NC and MZ drafted the manuscript. JQ and XZ revised the nal manuscript. XZ is responsible for summarising all data related to the virus. LZ is responsible for summarising all epidemiological and clinical data.

Declaration of interests

We declare no competing interests.


This study was funded by the National Key R&D Program of China (number 2017YFC1309700). We thank all patients involved in the study.


. 1  Lu H, Stratton CW, Tang YW. Outbreak of pneumonia of unknown etiology in Wuhan China: the mystery and the miracle. J Med Virol 2020; published online Jan 16. DOI:10.1002/jmv.25678.

. 2  Hui DS, I Azhar E, Madani TA, et al. The continuing 2019­nCoV epidemic threat of novel coronaviruses to global health ­ the latest 2019 novel coronavirus outbreak in Wuhan, China. Int J Infect Dis 2020; 91: 264–66.

. 3  Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet 2020; published online Jan 24. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140–6736(20)30183–5.

. 4  WHO. Clinical management of severe acute respiratory infection when Novel coronavirus (nCoV) infection is suspected:
interim guidance. Jan 11, 2020. https://www.who.int/internal­ publications­detail/clinical­management­of­severe­acute­respiratory­ infection­when­novel­coronavirus­(ncov)­infection­is­suspected (accessed Jan 20, 2020).

. 5  Yin Y, Wunderink RG. MERS, SARS and other coronaviruses as causes of pneumonia. Respirology 2018; 23: 130–37.

. 6  Drosten C, Günther S, Preiser W, et al. Identi cation of a novel coronavirus in patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome. N Engl J Med 2003; 348: 1967–76.

7 Zaki AM, van Boheemen S, Bestebroer TM, Osterhaus AD, Fouchier RA. Isolation of a novel coronavirus from a man with pneumonia in Saudi Arabia. N Engl J Med 2012; 367: 1814–20.

8 Guo L, Wei D, Zhang X, et al. Clinical features predicting mortality risk in patients with viral pneumonia: the MuLBSTA score.
Front Microbiol 2019; 10: 2752.

9 Hu B, Zeng LP, Yang XL, et al. Discovery of a rich gene pool of bat SARS­related coronaviruses provides new insights into the origin of SARS coronavirus. PLoS Pathog 2017; 13: e1006698.

10 Song HD, Tu CC, Zhang GW, et al. Cross­host evolution of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus in palm civet and human. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005; 102: 2430–35.

11 Haagmans BL, Al Dhahiry SH, Reusken CB, et al. Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus in dromedary camels:
an outbreak investigation. Lancet Infect Dis 2014; 14: 140–45.

12 Azhar EI, El­Kafrawy SA, Farraj SA, et al. Evidence for camel­to­ human transmission of MERS coronavirus. N Engl J Med 2014; 370: 2499–505.

13 Tao Y, Shi M, Chommanard C, et al. Surveillance of bat coronaviruses in Kenya identi es relatives of human coronaviruses NL63 and 229E and their recombination history. J Virol 2017; 91: e01953–16.

14 Cui J, Li F, Shi ZL. Origin and evolution of pathogenic coronaviruses. Nat Rev Microbiol 2019; 17: 181–92.

15 Zhou P, Fan H, Lan T, et al. Fatal swine acute diarrhoea syndrome caused by an HKU2­related coronavirus of bat origin. Nature 2018; 556: 255–58.

16 Xu XT, Chen P, Wang JF, et al. Evolution of the novel coronavirus from the ongoing Wuhan outbreak and modeling of its spike protein for the risk of human transmission. Sci China Life Sci 2020; published online Jan 21. DOI:10.1007/s11427–020–1637–5.

17 Chinese Academy of Sciences. Wuhan coronavirus has strong ability to infect humans. Press release. Jan 21, 2020. https://view. inews.qq.com/w2/20200121A0M08X00?tbkt=F&strategy=&openid= o04IBALMrLyGDxbWNOPoDM1IfG­s&uid=&refer=wx_hot (accessed Jan 29, 2020).

18 Song Z, Xu Y, Bao L, et al. From SARS to MERS, thrusting coronaviruses into the spotlight. Viruses 2019; 11: 59.

19 Badawi A, Ryoo SG. Prevalence of comorbidities in the Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS­CoV): a systematic review and meta­analysis. Int J Infect Dis 2016; 49: 129–33.

20 Channappanavar R, Fett C, Mack M, Ten Eyck PP, Meyerholz DK, Perlman S. Sex­based di erences in susceptibility to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus infection. J Immunol 2017;
198: 4046–53.

21 Jaillon S, Berthenet K, Garlanda C. Sexual dimorphism in innate immunity. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol 2019; 56: 308–21.

22 Dryden M, Baguneid M, Eckmann C, et al. Pathophysiology and burden of infection in patients with diabetes mellitus and peripheral vascular disease: focus on skin and soft­tissue infections. Clin Microbiol Infect 2015; 21 (suppl 2): S27–32.

23 Gao HN, Lu HZ, Cao B, et al. Clinical ndings in 111 cases of in uenza A (H7N9) virus infection. N Engl J Med 2013; 368: 2277–85.

24 Wang XF, Shi GC, Wan HY, et al. Clinical features of three avian in uenza H7N9 virus­infected patients in Shanghai. Clin Respir J 2014; 8: 410–16.

25 Liu WJ, Zhao M, Liu K, et al. T­cell immunity of SARS­CoV: implications for vaccine development against MERS­CoV. Antiviral Res 2017; 137: 82–92.

http://www.thelancet.com Published online January 29, 2020 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30211-7



Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: