The Surgeon Who Rewrote the Law

Dr. Muthulakshmi Reddy (1886–1968)


Pudukkottai, 1898. A twelve-year-old girl sits outside the door of a boys’ school, close enough to hear the teacher’s voice through the wall, too far to be let in.

“Go home, Muthu,” a cousin tells her. “Girls don’t need Euclid.”

She doesn’t move. Her father, Narayanaswami Iyer, the college principal, finds her there most afternoons. He could have scolded her back to the kitchen. Instead, one evening, he sits down beside her.

“You want to sit inside,” he says. It isn’t a question.

“Yes, Appa.”

He is quiet a long moment — a Brahmin professor whose own wife, Chandrammal, comes from a devadasi family, a lineage the town whispers about even as it applauds his daughter’s marks. He knows exactly what it will cost him to say yes.

“Then you will sit inside,” he says. “And you will not give anyone a reason to say it was a mistake.”

She never did.


By 1907, that stubborn insistence on sitting inside had carried her into Madras Medical College — the first woman admitted to a class of men who did not want her there. In 1912 she graduated at the top of that all-male class, becoming the first Hindu woman doctor in the Madras presidency. The men who had once shifted their chairs away from hers in the lecture hall now had to shake her hand at the convocation.

A junior doctor once asked her, years later, how she’d endured it.

“Endured what?” she said. “I was busy. I didn’t have time to notice who was uncomfortable.”

It was a joke, and it wasn’t. She had noticed everything — every closed door, every “not for girls,” every patient who arrived too late because there had been no woman doctor to see her decently. She simply refused to let the noticing slow her down.


Medicine, for Muthulakshmi, was never going to stay inside a clinic. She was the daughter of a woman who had been a devadasi — a system that dressed the exploitation of girls in the language of temple tradition — and she had grown up watching what happened to women the law refused to see. She treated the body in the morning and went after the law in the evening.

In 1926 she was nominated to the Madras Legislative Council, and walked in as one of the first women legislators anywhere in British India. Picture the chamber: rows of men in stiff collars, unused to a woman’s voice carrying across the floor, let alone one that had scalpel-steady nerves.

“The honourable member raises this matter with great feeling,” one legislator said, not quite hiding a smile, when she first proposed her bill against the devadasi system.

“The honourable member,” she replied, “has clearly never delivered a child whose mother was eleven years old. I recommend the experience. It clarifies the feeling considerably.”

The room went silent. The bill did not pass that year. It rarely does, the first time. She brought it back anyway, session after session, until the Devadasi Abolition Bill finally became law in 1947 — a fight that outlasted colonial rule itself.

She kept going. She helped push through the Sarda Act, raising the legal marriage age for girls to fourteen, and fought — session after session — for state money for girls’ schools, for low-caste girls, for Muslim girls, insisting that “education for some daughters” was not education at all.

In 1930, when Gandhi was arrested during the Civil Disobedience Movement, she resigned her Council seat in protest — a woman who had spent a lifetime fighting to hold a seat, giving it up in a single afternoon because principle outweighed position. A colleague reportedly asked if she was certain.

“I’ve never been more certain of anything less comfortable,” she is said to have answered.


Perhaps her most enduring legacy wasn’t a law at all. In 1954, long after most people would have called their life’s work finished, she founded what became the Adyar Cancer Institute — the second specialised cancer centre in India after the Tata Memorial Hospital, built from nothing but her own conviction that poor women shouldn’t die of a treatable disease simply because no one had built them a hospital.

A young doctor touring the half-built wards once asked her, doubtfully, where the money would come from.

“The same place it always comes from,” she said. “From people who are told something is impossible, and decide to do it slowly, on Tuesdays, in between everything else.”


She was awarded the Padma Bhushan in 1956, and died on 22 July 1968, at eighty-one, still working. Her birthday, 30 July, is now observed in Tamil Nadu as Hospital Day. The girl who once sat outside a locked door became the woman entire hospitals are named for.

Her real subject, across sixty years of medicine and law, was never really disease. It was the number of doors a woman was told not to open — and how many of them, one at a time, session by session, patient by patient, she opened anyway.


Sources consulted: Wikipedia; Encyclopedia.com; PMC (National Library of Medicine); DailyRounds; Medbound Times; India International Centre Occasional Publication 44.

Leave a comment